CROYDON IN CRISIS: Questions have been raised over Labour’s decision not to suspend the former deputy leader of the council, while Town Hall chiefs prepare for a flurry of disciplinary meetings next week
Suspended: Tony Newman
Yesterday’s “administrative suspension” of councillors Tony Newman and Simon Hall by the Labour Party prompted some of their erstwhile colleagues to come forward and call for further sanctions, amid allegations of “shocking bullying” within their party’s Town Hall group.
Inside Croydon understands that Newman and Hall have been suspended by the Labour Party, pending a formal review of their part in the financial collapse of the council. The suspensions have come because Newman and Hall are both named in the Penn Report, the investigation conducted into possible wrong-doing at the council, carried out by Richard Penn backed by the Local Government Association.
Last night, a council committee was told by Elaine Jackson, the borough’s recently appointed assistant chief executive, that her boss, Katherine Kerswell, “had very recently received that report”.
That ethics committee is to be reconvened next Friday morning, when the findings of the Penn Report will be high on the agenda. Items for discussion include “Statutory Chief Officer Disciplinary Procedure”, and “Complaint under the Councillor Code of Conduct”. Neither items have their formal reports yet available on the council website, so the public is left to ponder what it might all be about.
That ethics committee comes in a flurry of significant meetings planned for next week.
Busy week ahead: Katherine Keerswell
These begin on Tuesday, when the scrutiny committee will discuss the council’s budget for 2021-2022 (notably, in the likely absence of Lisa Taylor, the council’s finance director, who is one of four execs who were suspended this week).
On Thursday afternoon, there is an appointments committee meeting, when the main business is “Review of Management Arrangements – To consider a report of the Chief Executive”. Again, the report has not yet been made available, although this seems certain to discuss the status of the suspended executive directors.
That evening comes the cabinet meeting which is to discuss the plans to wind down or flog-off Brick by Brick and the council’s strategy for disposing of its other property assets (in a fire sale, in a pandemic… This won’t end well).
As if that wasn’t enough fun and games for one week, Friday sees the ethics committee get together in the morning to consider the Penn Report, and then at 2pm there’s another appointments committee meeting, this time with an agenda that asks them “To consider the report on the Statutory Chief Officer Disciplinary Procedure and establish an Investigating and Disciplinary Sub-Committee”.
Under existing council procedures, this meeting has been called by Jacqueline Harris-Baker, in her role as borough solicitor and monitoring officer. A council monitoring officer’s duties include keeping a check on matters which they believe are, or are likely to be, illegal or amount to maladministration, and to be responsible for the conduct of councillors and officers.
Jacqueline Harris-Baker: trained as a lawyer, given director of resources job
Harris-Baker, who was promoted to executive director of resources by former CEO Jo Negrini, is currently on sick leave. Sources at the council suggest that once she is well enough to return to work, she will join her four exec director colleagues in herself being suspended.
A Katharine Street source said today, “The Penn Report is tied up in a lot of legal red tape.”
Another cource said, “Kerswell and the council’s leadership have to be so very careful, after suspending those four exec directors this week. They could be looking at some very costly constructive dismissal cases if they don’t get everything exactly right.”
And there’s a dearth of options for action over any misconduct by elected councillors, too, it seems. As Inside Croydon has previously reported, the Localism Act from 2011 stripped away local authority powers to suspend councillors. That was confirmed to last night’s ethics committee, with the Tory government said to be “dragging its feet on legislation to implement the LGA recommendations which would effectively reintroduce such powers”, according to another source.
Which is why suspension by the Labour Party of Newman and Hall is so significant.
“Someone in the Croydon Labour group must have had sight of the Penn Report,” a source said.
Not suspended: Alison Butler
Others are unable to explain why Alison Butler, as Newman’s statutory deputy leader, has not suffered a siimilar suspension. “Anything that Simon Hall did as a cabinet member, he did because of the powers delegated to him by the strong leader, and by the statutory deputy leader.
“That suggests that Alison ought to have been suspended, too.”
Cynics suggest that Butler, who was also the cabinet member for housing, responsible for the Brick by Brick fiiasco, might have been given a free pass because of her past relationship with David Evans, who is the Keir Starmer-appointed secretary general of the Labour Party, and may have had advance knowledge of suspensions of such high-profile members as Newman and Hall.
Jason Cummings, the deputy leader of Croydon’s Tory oppostion group at the Town Hall, has called for Butler and her husband, Paul Scott, who has been in charge of the borough’s planning system for the past six years, to both be suspended.
Saying that he welcomed the suspensions of Newman and Hall, Cummings said, “Who knows why Butler and Scott have not been suspended, too? We would like to see them suspended, too. It has to be all four of them.”
There is some suggestion that their non-suspended status is because neither Butler nor Scott rate a mention in the Penn Report. If true, a Katharine Street source said, “That would be a woeful omission. It shows how poorly drafted Penn’s terms of reference were, and how perfunctory his investigation might prove to be.”
Suspended: Simon Hall
The removal of Newman and Hall, temporarily, at least, while any complaints against them are investigated, does mean that they are banned from attending meetings of the Labour group, something which some of their erstwhile colleagues say that they found to be intimidating, and prevented open discussion on the council’s financial collapse.
Last week, another report, this time commissioned by the government, identified Newman and “… an inner circle of a small number of cabinet members who have been very controlling in their management of the council and its finances”.
The report, following a rapid review commissioned by local government minister Robert Jenrick, found that “council officials were instructed by members of Newman’s cabinet to rewrite some of their reports, in effect to disguise the council’s mounting financial problems”.
One long-standing Labour councillor, speaking to Inside Croydon on condition of strict anonymity, said, “Why has it taken so long?
“Since the council’s financial crisis went out of control back in September, and following Tony and Simon’s rsignations, they’ve been able to attend group meetings, they’ve been able to vote at council meetings… It still feels like we’re being watched, in case we speak out.
“We’ve certainly not been able to discuss some matters as freely as we might have liked, or needed to.”
And another Labour councillor, quoted by the Local Government Chronicle, said that the culture of Newman’s cabinet was “one of shocking bullying”.
They said, “If you challenged their authority, you were sacked. Every political trick in the book was used to remove people who actually did their job.
“They saw people who were good at asking the right questions as a threat, rather than something to embrace.”
- Click here for the MHCLG’s Rapid Review report
- Click here for the model code of conduct for councillors, considered at last night’s ethics committee
Read more: Newman and Hall are ‘administratively suspended’ by Labour
Read more: Council forced to declare itself bankrupt
Read more: Officials to investigate possible wrong-doing at council
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and BBC London News
- ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named the country’s rottenest borough in 2020 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine – the fourth successive year that Inside Croydon has been the source for such award-winning nominations
- Inside Croydon: 3million page views in 2020. Seen by 1.4million unique visitors
Sounds like a very unpleasant working environment. There needs to be a national whistle blower organisation that can give people confidence they will be heard and not suffer repercussions for telling of wrong doing in the public sector.
Join a union. Trouble is, many don’t till it’s too late: you tend not to get access to lawyers for a few months.
Unions seem to be politicised and if you work for local government you might be unsure whether a union is as independent as one would like.
Of course unions are politicised. There would not be any point otherwise. It is a fundamental political act for labour to band together to balance the power and wealth of their employers.
There’s no surprise here. With the shameless arrogance, lack of accountability and bestowing of money to buy favour comes the accusations of “shocking bullying”. One often to leads to the other.
Why Alison Butler and Paul Scott are not also suspended is beyond me and needs looking into. For other acts of “shocking bullying”, observe Scott in action on Croydon’s planning committee. Here residents are left unsupported, speaking to a three minute clock whilst Scott gloats and encourages developers to densify and build taller. Obscene to watch Scott smugly watching residents squirm and repeatedly, one after another, not matter how shit and inappropriate the proposal, putting the forward the motion to Approve.
This self-serving, misguided, dictatorial planning misfit should be booted off the planning committee and stripped of his Cllr title. And, oh yes, his wife is Alison Butler who helped set up BrickxBrick and turned a blind eye whilst it bled the council’s finances dry.
Ali; time to take action.
I would think the voters of Croydon would be pleased to see the back of Scott and Butler.
Absolutely right, Sebastian. All vestiges, every bit of them. of the vile Newman regime need to be eradicated from within the Council for it to function properly again and to have any respect from the voting public.
Sadly, as has been pointed out before, there are too many wards where they could put a red rosette on a pig and it would get elected. I sometimes wonder how many people in the world outside this esteemed organ really care about their councillors?
If you are on the receiving end of a 9 flat building shoehorned in beside your family house, you’ll be interested in the name of your local councillor and the name of the reckless prat (Paul Scott) who has largely facilitated it by changing Croydon’s planning rules.
I like the analogy of a pig with a rosette- explains the ascendancy and recent fall from grace of one prominent councillor I can think of.
Equally, there are parts of the borough where a Gloucester Old Spot with a blue rosette is guaranteed 1,000 votes…