The time might be right for Croydon’s own Independents’ Day

CROYDON COMMENTARY: The council’s political duopoly has failed, so often and so miserably, that the time might have come for the borough’s long-suffering residents to try a different approach to running the Town Hall, says TIM RODGERS, pictured right

It’s impossible to read Inside Croydon and not conclude that something is very wrong with local government in our borough.

The financial difficulties, the housing scandal at Regina Road, Brick by Brick… I could go on.

The next local elections in May 2022 promise to be a referendum on the performance of Labour, although as the by-elections held on “Super Thursday” earlier this month showed, the old North-South divide of our borough, split between Labour and Tories, shows little sign of changing.

There’s the possibility next May of some of the wards in the middle of the borough flipping, due in part to the collapse in the UKIP/Brexit/Little Englander vote. But it will be a fairly tall order for the Conservatives to reclaim control of Croydon in 2022, even after all that has gone on in the past 12 months.

And to be honest, do we really want this?

Replacing a Labour Party that is failing locally with the Conservative Party that is failing nationally seems to be a pointless exercise.

The £144m spent on Fisher’s Folly was the start of the council’s financial collapse

You’ll recall the Tories’ exit in 2014, what with the #WadGate allowances scandal, the £144million spent on Fisher’s Folly and a financial black hole which (along with a central government squeeze) arguably set the scene for the current woes.

You will also recall in recent years a steady stream of awful senior managers in the council – Elvery, Negrini, Kerswell, Harris-Baker and so forth…

So who is holding these senior council officials to account?

Where are they now? The disgraced former Tory council leader, Mike Fisher

There’s an obvious structural weakness in having a chair of the overview and scrutiny committee from the same party as the administration, but to what extent are the current elected members being truly representative and calling out the council’s paid administrators?

How could children’s services be allowed to fall into such a state that urgent intervention was necessary, with millions of pounds spent over three years to restore Ofsted’s approval?

Has “politics” really worked in Croydon?

The answer, it appears, is for us to kick politics to the curb and for good people to step forward as independent candidates to provide some proper challenge those that work in Bernard Weatherill House.

Because it appears that one other question that hasn’t been asked is, “Why?”

Why is it like this? Why isn’t this working? Why can they get away with this?

Money pit: was £200m Brick by Brick a politician’s idea gone bad, or the product of power-crazed council officials?

I write this as a Labour supporter. I might still be a member, though possibly for not much longer if someone reads this. I’m not sure if Croydon South, where I live, still has a Constituency Labour Party. They’ve not held any meetings of members, virtual or otherwise, for nearly 16 months. It’s pretty pointless down here anyway.

I’ve got 18 years’ experience across five London local authorities, and I’m a regular reader of Rotten Boroughs in Private Eye. I think people can do better than the politicians.

Croydon’s Mayoral Referendum on October 7 promises to offer a new way of doing things. Experience across London boroughs suggests that a directly-elected mayor isn’t always the answer, though. Tower Hamlets saw Lutfur Rahman swept in and bundled out. Jules Pipe got respect at Hackney for a bit. Sir Robin Wales was in at Newham for 16 years before being de-selected by his party.

Can we genuinely say that any of this has been a success?

Increasingly, it seems that people free of a political party, who can be truly representative of their residents, are necessary to scrutinise the council.

Jo Negrini: who held the CEO to account before handing her a £420,000 pay-off?

There is precedent across London: in Havering there is a strong residents’ presence on the council. Not enough to take control, but enough to deny the Conservatives overall control, and so hold an important “kingmaker” status. This might work here in Croydon – there are residents’ associations already in place that could mobilise and support local candidates.

It’s possible to fully democratise this process, to develop a local manifesto based on local issues and the support they attract. However, the idea of “self-representation” – to argue with the officers because the people that are supposed to do this on our behalf aren’t doing it – is, to me, the most attractive.

There are several barriers. One, of course, is taking on the party machines.

Second will be allegations of a lack of professionalism, but frankly I don’t think passionate amateurs lose out to career politicians in the final analysis.

The third is time. Being a councillor is, or should be, a busy role. Meetings, correspondence, grilling senior managers, all take energy and commitment.

But hopefully there are 70 people across Croydon that will read this and say, “Yes, I could do this.”

  • Are you interested in responding to Tom Rodgers’ rallying call? Email with “Independents” in the subject field, with some brief personal details and contact number, and we will forward to him
  • Croydon Commentary is a platform for all our readers to offer their personal views about what matters to them in and around the borough. To submit an article for publication, just email us at, or post your comment to an Inside Croydon article that has caught your attention

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at
  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and BBC London News
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named the country’s rottenest borough in 2020 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine – the fourth successive year that Inside Croydon has been the source for such award-winning nominations
  • Inside Croydon: 3million page views in 2020. Seen by 1.4million unique visitors

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in 2021 Mayor Referendum, 2022 council elections, Brick by Brick, Community associations, Croydon Central, Croydon Council, Croydon North, Croydon South, Jo Negrini and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The time might be right for Croydon’s own Independents’ Day

  1. Maybe it’s a sign that ‘party politics’ has had its day in local government? Perhaps this could usher in the return of independents? Or ‘residents’ councillors?

  2. Peter Underwood says:

    Just because Labour and the Conservatives have failed Croydon doesn’t mean that ‘politics’ has failed.

    I agree that we should be electing different people on to the council, and that’s one of the many reasons why I stand for the Green Party.

    The Green Party doesn’t have a whip system like the other parties, so our politicians aren’t told what to do by the party. We are as free as any independent to represent residents.

    As Green Party members, we believe that power comes from the bottom up, not the top down. So you know that we are going to challenge authority on behalf of the people who elect us as you will have seen Caroline Lucas do in Parliament and Greens do at all other levels of Government.

    As was show in the recent Mayor of London elections, when independent candidates stand, its not always clear what they are standing for.

    The Mayoral independents ranged from the far right to the soft left of politics, but most people I talked to had no idea what they stood for.

    At least when you vote Green you know what you are getting.

  3. Rod Davies says:

    The rot in Croydon Council started decades ago and like a cancer it slowly spread through the organisation. It was evident that the council simply didn’t know how to respond to the challenges of the early 90’s recession and the structural changes in the economy. I saw opportunities arise and Croydon turn them down.
    Part of the problem was Croydon’s introspection and self-isolation. While other boroughs busily networked and collaborated, Croydon was aloof and considered itself unique.
    Croydon Council was renowned for its dysfunction and silo-mentality that prevented coherent action. There were cultures of bullying where staff raising serious complaints found themselves driven out. If elected officials were ignorant it was because they didn’t make the effort to reality check what they were assured of, and so it was all too tempting to avoid telling them of the problems – especially if it meant risking your employment and health.
    Of the whistle-blowing complaints that I knew of, some raised very serious issues. Did members ever require oversight of the number of complaints, the progress & outcomes? Not to my knowledge, and so the practices continued.
    If any single event illustrated the culture in Croydon Council for me it was 7/7. A core of relatively junior officers held things together and managed the response. Managers seemed to offer no meaningful leadership and no care for their staff, some of whom were vulnerable individuals.
    And that morning the Director of Finance informed his staff he was leaving because he lived some way away, got into his car and switched off his mobile phone. The problem was that only he had the authorisation code needed to be able to order food & other essentials for the Borough Emergency Control Centre team, and so they had nothing to eat other than biscuits they plundered.

Leave a Reply