Our motoring correspondent, JEREMY CLACKSON, goes through the small print of the Tory council’s latest wheeze to make an extra £1m a year from residents – including charging drivers of zero-emissions cars seven times more than previously

No alternative: even before the end of March, the council started removing its parking meters – regardless of its public consultation
One of the borough’s largest residents’ associations claims that the council is trying to sneak in night-time parking charges, in what could be another massive blow to Croydon’s already struggling night-time economy, while also hitting thousands of residents in new-build blocks of flats.
The plans have been approved by Tory Mayor Jason Perry, with a report signed off by his cabinet member for streets and environment, Scott Roche.
Inside Croydon reported this week how Mayor Perry had stitched up the council’s environment scrutiny committee, appointing climate crisis sceptic Alasdair Stewart, a Conservative councillor, as its chair. The move has been described by opposition councillors as piss-poor Perry “marking his own homework”.
The money-spinning parking proposals could be among the first big items on the agenda of the now Tory-chaired environment scrutiny committee.
The council claims that its proposals are “cost neutral”, but the official papers also suggest an extra £1million per year in revenue, up from £10million, from the parking proposals.
The council has proposed some free parking periods in the borough’s district centres, but since March – long before the public consultation had been completed – it has been removing all the parking meters on Croydon’s streets and car parks, forcing the public to use a smartphone app or, if they don’t own a smartphone, try their luck in finding a nearby shop offering online payment facilities.

Money-spinner: Tory cabinet member Scott Roche
Buried away in Appendix C of the official council papers are the new night-time charges – which could hit thousands of residents in flats built in the past decade without any dedicated parking spaces.
Parking in Croydon Council car parks has always previously been free after 6pm. Under these proposals, the only place where night-time parking will remain free of charge is New Addington.
The council says, “The changes are intended to encourage lower emission vehicles and to help address air quality and public health objectives. They are also intended to improve access to amenities to serve local shoppers and the economies of the district centres.”
Yet the council’s own report shows that they plan higher charges to park lower emission cars. Under Mayor Perry’s proposals, drivers of zero-emissions vehicles will pay seven times more for parking their car than at present.
There’s also huge increases proposed in charges for annual permits – some increases of £700 or more.
The council also says that its recommendations “are aimed at simplifying parking charges”.
Some of the proposals included in the council’s formal consultation were not mentioned when the various schemes were first floated last year.
The council wants to remove completely all simple free time-limited parking. This is being replaced by pay-by-phone parking, with a zero charge for the first hour. The charge is then £2.40 for two hours, “hardly cheap”, according to one resident.
“No other council in outer London uses this system,” they say.
The problems using the RingGo app were presented to pro-pollution Perry and the council last year – and ignored. Pay-by-phone means that every Croydon resident downloading the app has to provide personal and financial details to a third-party, private company, with all the data security risks that comes with that.
The council has so far remained tight-lipped on how, or who, will get to use the data accrued about individuals’ car use and parking habits.
Some also claim that the phone app system discriminates against older residents. “Older people are far less likely to use a smartphone, to use the internet on their phone, or to use internet banking. How are they expected to park their car in Croydon?”
While the council insists that there will be a PayPoint alternative available in shops in all locations around the borough, where people can register their car to park for free on the street, trials last year highlighted the serious shortcomings in that system.
During the trial, the advertised PayPoint in Purley was at Shell petrol station – a long walk away from the parking spaces. Sources working at the garage claim that the PayPoint there had never worked.
East Coulsdon Residents’ Association this week lodged their response to the council consultation.

Business interests: ECRA’s Charlie King
ECRA chair Charlie King wrote: “We welcome the adoption of our suggestion for district centres of one-hour free parking and a second hour paid for at a sensible price,” ECRA says.
“We also welcome that this will be standardised across the borough.”
But he added that the council plans to extend controls to shopping parades across the borough which have never previously been metered or controlled in such a way. This, ECRA says, will “have a detrimental impact on these local shops and economy”.
ECRA has asked that a 15-minute “grace period” should be built in to the hour’s free parking to allow time for people to visit a PayPoint, which, they say, “does take some time and can be inconvenient for very short-term parking”.
They add: “It is also detrimental and discriminatory against those who do not have or cannot use a mobile phone, particularly the elderly of which there is a large number in the local area.”
The 15-minute grace period “would also enable people who just want to drop off or pick up somebody or something from a local shop or business the ability to do so without risk of incurring a penalty charge”. It is a system commonly used by supermarkets and at railway stations. “The Government guidelines suggest at least 10 minutes.”
And ECRA rejects the notion of night-time parking charges. “The existing free parking after 6pm and all day on Sundays are very important to the economy of Coulsdon and must remain.”
King said of the night-time parking charges: “Government policy says that parking should reflect the needs of businesses and communities.
“This does not.”
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

FREE ADS: Paid-up subscribers to Inside Croydon qualify for a free ad for their business, residents’ association or community group, just one of the benefits of being part of our online community. For more information about being an iC subscriber, click here for our Patreon page
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our near 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, which is featured on Google News Showcase and followed by 16,000 on Twitter/X, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine

What else would you expect from Croydon Conservatives. They’re making it more dangerous to cycle and more expensive to drive. And this from a Mayor who set up and ran a social media group that planned and applauded racist demonstrations and attacks on ULEZ cameras, I hope those people who signed up to his Tory electioneering propaganda now realise they’ve been conned
So finally we find what car friendly means from part time Perry and rustling Roche.
Car friendly taxation.
So the result is more diners/shoppers going elsewhere and so lower turnover and profit and thus failed high street businesses with the loss of business rates, local jobs and the replacement with charity shops or barren vacant shops that dont pay into the pot and dont have paying car owners.
Diverting more money into Amazons online pocket and away from paying reasonable business rates on its warehouse. . . .
Why park at night to go to a restaurant? This is doing the dirty work of Bluewater and Westfield with their free car parks that have trashed central Croydon so successfully at no cost or penalty to themselves that 300,000 Croydonians park and shop elsewhere at their privately owned and thriving shopping centres.
I suggested common sense.
As has been said the problem with common sense is that it is not that common.
The problem is that we have two-faced part-time piss-poor porkie-pies Perry for Mayor
I remember visiting a small town near Port Vale Football club a fair few years ago. Half the shops had closed but people still had to pay to park. It’s madness.
Pulling out the clean air card also seems like a poor excuse for charging people at night.
It is possible, and plausible, to reinforce some emissions-reducing policy with car parking charges – encouraging the use of less-polluting cars. Just like ULEZ does.
But it is well-established by the Mayor that piss-poor Perry is *pro-pollution* and a climate change denier.
Increasing parking charges for zero-emissions vehicles in this way is one thing only: a money-grabbing scheme and a war on motorists. Everything that hypocrite Perry accused ULEZ of being. Just that these parking charges will do nothing to help improve the quality of the air that we breathe.
Anyone up for joining a Facebook page: “Croydon against Mayor Perry’s parking charges”?
What good is there to say about Croydon council?
The gap should say it all ( Nothing). I’ve lived in Croydon all my 65 years of life.
At least i can say when i finaly retire @ age 66 next year, i’m off up North ( wish i was young & healthy enough to move abroad.
I may yet be living under another corrupt coucil? who knows? But not as corrupt as this one. I belive if you look back in Croydon councils history, before my time. Corruption was the same. Yet corrupt officials were brought to book & served hard labour as sentances after extradition ( check the history of Croydon).
Here we are in the UK. Supposedly other country’s envious of our NHS system & look up to our legal system and other things.
On the legal avenue just look across the great water ( Atlantic) A president has all charges against them, found to be guilty. Matters not if he gets away with it. Or has no prison sentance, community service or what ever.
It looks like Justice has is being done.
Yet in the UK it seems criminals just need money enough to have good lawyers.
Here in Croydon in the UK. We have had a council made bancrupt several times ( not the only council).
Yet the perpetrators get off scot free with wonderfull pay off’s and pension rights.
Then either get the same or better jobs within another council. Or jobs on the companies that helped bancrupt Croydon. Again go on to find another well paid six figure paying job. How is this allowed to happen in the UK?
It doe’s seem at times that the legal system or the systems! In general are not equal & fair as we think.
Again, we need to re-state, there has been no evidence of corruption found over Croydon Council’s financial collapse.
But there’s plenty of evidence of a corrupted system, and while much focus is on the politicians involved, it is true that the council officials who presided over the clusterfuck have largely walked away unchallenged for their conduct.
Only one of them, though, managed to get one of those pay-outs.
How’s Mayor Perry getting along with his pursuit of Jo Negrini’s golden handshake, the one that expensive and usually reliable lawyers said he had no chance of success with?
Having killed Croydon shopping through crippling car parking charges our useless mayor seeks to drive the last visitors away
You couldn’t make up this level of incompetence
Meanwhile the verges are uncut and waist high disgrace