CROYDON IN CRISIS: Keir Starmer’s new government seems in no rush to deal with the deep-seated problems caused by 14 years of austerity inflicted on local councils, as Jason Perry’s plea for an urgent meeting is given a cold shoulder by a junior minister. By WALTER CRONXITE, political editor
No rush: government officials will meet the ‘improvement’ panel before they talk to Mayor Jason Perry
Labour junior minister Jim McMahon has put Croydon’s Tory Mayor, powerless Jason Perry, firmly in his place telling him that he will meet to discuss the borough’s continuing financial struggles when he is good and ready – and not until after he has had a proper briefing from the quasi-commissioners on the government-appointed “improvement” and assurance panel.
The calculated snub from McMahon, the Minister of State for Local Government and English Devolution in Keir Starmer’s new government, reinforces the reality of piss-poor Perry’s enfeebled position since March 2021, when his own Conservative party colleague, Michael Gove, gave increased powers to his improvement panel, and rendered Croydon’s first executive mayor impotent.
Gove authorised the government to take control out of the hands of Perry and the council’s chief executive, Katherine Kerswell, by announcing an “intervention” and assigning greater powers to its improvement and assurance panel. This followed Perry issuing a Section 114 notice of his own – admitting he was unable to balance the council budgets – in November 2022, and then hiking the borough’s Council Tax by 21% in the space of 12 months.
Begging letter: Angela Rayner didn’t bother replying to Mayor Perry’s lengthy letter
Croydon Council budgets since then have only been “balanced”, in an Alice-In-Wonderland kinda way, by the inclusion of £38million in capitalisation directions, government bail-outs.
With no solution in sight, and the borough’s £1.3billion debt mountain needing £62million a year to service, Mayor Perry (quite rightly, it should be said), sent what amounted to a begging letter to Angela Rayner last month, straight after Labour’s General Election victory. Rayner, as well as being Deputy Prime Minister, has been appointed to Gove’s old job, though now it is as Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.
“I am pleased that someone who understands local government has been appointed to this role,” Perry wrote to Rayner, suggesting that he did not think that Gove did understand local government. Or housing. Or communities.
Perry laid it on a bit thick, claiming that he had somehow “fixed” the finances in Croydon, albeit with £417million of additional borrowing.
The pressing state of local government finances was “paramount”, Perry patronised the Deputy Prime Minister. Croydon’s problems, the £82,000 per year powerless Mayor told Rayner, are “insurmountable”
Don’t call us…: Jim McMahon won’t be rushing to meet Jason Perry
“I would welcome a meeting with you, at your earliest opportunity, to discuss these
matters further,” Perry simpered in his letter to Rayner.
That was July 8.
Rayner has not replied to Perry.
She delegated that to McMahon, and last week, Perry released the letter.
It might be wrong to describe McMahon’s response to Perry as condescending. But it is a close-run thing.
Parroting Rayner’s message to council leaders in July about “mutual respect, genuine collaboration and meaningful engagement”, McMahon waited to the fourth of his five business-like paragraphs to turn the knife.
McMahon wrote, bluntly: “I intend to meet with the Improvement and Assurance Panel following the summer recess.” So that’s them first, and in no real hurry, either.
McMahon added, “I would be happy to meet with you to discuss progress at the London Borough of Croydon… My office will be in touch to arrange a suitable opportunity in September.”
In other words: Don’t call us, Jase, we’ll call you.
Misleading: how the council website portrayed the minister’s reply. McMahon’s letter to Mayor Perry said nothing of the sort
Perry and his council advisers waited until late on the Friday of a Bank Holiday weekend before releasing any details of McMahon’s response. This was Croydon Council’s attempt to “bury bad news”.
And they spun the contents of McMahon’s letter, presenting it as some kind of triumph: “Mayor to work with new government on fixing Croydon’s finances”, they claimed, in a wholly misleading way.
“This is a positive development in my campaign to find a longer-term solution for Croydon that will enable us to get back on track,” was the slant Perry chose to put on matters.
The long hoped-for write-off of a chunk of Croydon’s debts – most of its loans are from the government – remains a distant prospect. “Croydon will need a new solution, with a support package from government, if the council is to become financially sustainable for the future,” Perry said. Tory Perry had more than two years under a Conservative government to deliver such a solution, and failed.
And it could be weeks yet before he gets to sit down with McMahon for some tea and cake and a natter about how best to handle £1.3billion of toxic debt while still delivering the local services that Croydon residents need.
Read more: Perry admits he has failed in begging letter to Labour’s Rayner
Read more: Perry pleads poverty when he has more Council Tax than ever
Read more: Croydon put in special measures: ‘Worst of all possible worlds’
Read more: The solution to Perry’s finance problem: Fund Croydon Fairly
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
It’s not just Perry that is being snubbed, it’s the whole borough and each and everyone of us.
This Labour government, that promised change before 4 July, is continuing austerity, planning tax increases and service cuts. Starmer’s warning about a “really painful budget” is his way of rehashing Thatcher’s dictum, “there is no alternative”.
That’s bollocks of course.
We’re paying more and more to once nationalised suppliers of energy, water and public transport while their profits soar.
Big tax-dodgers like Amazon and others are estimated to have dodged paying £2bn in 2021 alone.
In January, the Grauniad reported that HMRC has not charged a single company under landmark legislation passed six years ago to crack down on corporate tax evasion.
Us mugs are being shafted while Keith’s brand new mates are hanging on to their ill-gotten gains
I believe the new Government will insist on the removal of Katherine Kerswell.
She is an obvious choice for change given her weak performance since joining the council.
A bizarre fantasy. But let’s indulge it. The removal of Katherine Kerswell at the direction of “the new Government” would be a worrying move (who else would they kick out of jobs for no valid and legal reason) and very expensive (much more than a “Negrini”), with the costs coming out of Croydon council’s coffers, i.e. our money.
Is that what you want? Cos that’s what’ll happen
To be fair, Arf, the smart money at Fisher’s Folly has been on KK angling for a juicy pay-off (the second of her unillustrious, unindustrious career), to top up her gilt-edged pension, since about five minutes after she arrived in September 2020…
Interesting your observation about Perry and Gove. Does illustrate there was some frustration on Perry’s part about his fellow Tory not giving him a ray of light to deal with the Croydon Chaos and take some kudos for it.
His complete political impotence is now being revealed in the desperate grovelling to his opponents to dig him out of the hole. Thought Perry would have known with his own divisive form of politics of throwing opponents under the bus that he really should not expect any favours after his own behaviour.
Afraid with his opponents now wearing the clothes of his Tories in power that the future is looking bleak for old Part-Time.