Dear Angela: It’s time for you to act and fund Croydon fairly

Last month, the Croydon Mayor wrote to the Deputy Prime Minister begging for an urgent meeting to resolve the council’s long-standing financial problems after 14 years of Tory austerity. Angela Rayner did not reply. So now ANDREW FISHER, pictured right, on behalf of Croydon, and of Inside Croydon, has written this open letter

Dear Angela,

Across the country, councils are in financial crisis. This is due in large part to the huge budget cuts that have been imposed on councils by successive Conservative governments. In part, too, it has been exacerbated by local failures, by increasing service demand and here, in Croydon, by long-term structural underfunding.

Time for action: Angela Rayner has inherited huge problems in local government from the Tories

In 2022-2023, government funding to Croydon Council was worth £239.25 per resident. Neighbouring Lambeth gets £481.73 for each of their residents. Ask your cabinet colleague Steve Reed – he now represents a constituency that straddles both boroughs.

This inequality in funding has been the case for years. If Croydon got the same funding as Lambeth per resident, we’d have an extra £95million to spend every year – more than enough to balance the books.

But so far for Croydon, the only solution offered has been repeated “capitalisation directions”. These are neither loans nor bailouts, but in essence a demand from government for the council to try to balance the books by selling off local assets – libraries, nurseries, land, buildings that house local voluntary sector organisations, and so on.

This is the epitome of the kind of “sticking plaster politics” that the Prime Minister has railed against. In essence, you can only pay your rent by selling off the furniture for a short time.

Alongside these sell-offs, which have failed to balance Croydon’s books, there have been huge cuts to our public services. We have suffered above-inflation hikes in Council Tax, while statutory services like social care have had their budgets slashed.

You know the consequences of these sort of cuts. They don’t balance the books, they impose larger costs on the NHS and on the social security system. Penny-pinching cuts often cost more in the long run.

There is a shortage of care workers across the country, and the visa restrictions brought in by the last government have reduced the number of overseas workers coming into the sector – leading to more shortages and putting more elderly and disabled residents at risk of neglect. Please speak to your ministerial colleagues in the Home Office to reverse this counterproductive policy.

Alongside the service cuts to care, our struggling children’s services and other areas, there has been the closure of vital local services (half of the borough’s public libraries are set to be downgraded, with four earmarked for closure) and many local voluntary sector organisations that provided a lifeline to those hit hardest by austerity have been defunded.

As you well know, once these public institutions are sold off or closed, they will be lost forever, with no hope of ever replacing them – and our communities less well-served forever.

‘The situation is untenable’: simply providing bail-outs and ‘capitalisation directions’ to councils like Croydon is not fixing the underfunding issues

With each job lost at the council, we are losing experienced, knowledgeable staff – and making the council ever less capable of delivering the “Change” Labour promised in its election manifesto.

The situation is untenable.

You know it. I know it. Every councillor and senior official of Croydon Council knows it, too, as do the members of the government-appointed “improvement” panel, and as should, by now, every official in your Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government.

Hiking Council Tax is not a solution either. Since 2023, Council Tax in Croydon has gone up by 21%. We are paying more to get less – and it puts a disproportionate burden on less wealthy households.

As you will be well aware, Council Tax is a regressive tax, with Band H properties only paying around three times as much as the average Band A property. Those on the highest incomes are often earning far more than three times that of those on the lowest wages.

In Croydon, many care workers’ income is at, or just above, the minimum wage of around £22,000 a year, while the council’s chief executive is paid around £200,000 a year – more than the Prime Minister and 10 times what a care worker actually earns. That salary is  about 18 times more than many pensioners receive, and they will be losing their Winter Fuel Payment this year.

Under-paid: care workers in Croydon receive around 1/10th of what the council’s CEO is paid

Since Council Tax benefit was abolished, councils with smaller budgets have had to fund their own “Council Tax support” schemes. Any above-inflation increase in Council Tax hits some of the poorest people hardest.

As is the situation across the country, throughout our borough more people than ever are reliant on food banks, thanks to the removal of the welfare safety net at both local and national level.

So our council struggles to deliver basic services. The borough’s residents do not have the capacity to pay ever higher Council Tax. And the borough has few remaining assets to be stripped to fund day-to-day services. The only sensible solution is for this government to do what the last government failed to do: fund Croydon fairly.

While a bailout would be nice, or having some of the debt written off desirable, actually just simply funding us on anything like the same basis as neighbouring Lambeth would be fine.

I understand your deputy Jim McMahon might meet with our no-longer-executive Mayor Jason Perry, after he has met with the laughably titled “improvement and assurance panel”. Let me assure you that any improvements that this panel has provided have yet to be noticed by Croydon residents, although they have trousered rather generous consultancy fees.

I do hope that as Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State, you will protect local government and ensure that a fair settlement is delivered for Croydon and all councils. You and all local councillors need to take a strong stand against another round of austerity – which will simply see more councils issuing Section 114 notices.

Let the promised “painful budget” this autumn be felt by corporate landlords, profiteering energy companies and banks, those who make their money from capital gains and those billionaires whose wealth has ballooned while living standards have fallen for the rest of us.

I hope that helps to clear up some important, vital points for the future of Croydon and many local authorities around the country,

Your sincerely,
Andrew

Andrew Fisher’s recent columns:


Inside Croydon – If you want real journalism, delivering real news, from a publication that is actually based in the borough, please consider paying for it. Sign up today: click here for more details


  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
  • As featured on Google News Showcase
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Adult Social Care, Andrew Fisher, Children's Services, Council Tax, Croydon Council, Improvement Board, Katherine Kerswell, Libraries, Section 114 notice, Steve Reed MP, Streatham and Croydon North and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Dear Angela: It’s time for you to act and fund Croydon fairly

  1. Kevin Croucher says:

    I imagine that her staff filter her mail, so she will not even see this, never mind reply

  2. You are quite right. Her staff will certainly filter her mail. I’ve done that job in a different administration. The original letter is fine….but just too long by 80% at least. It stands a better chance of being ticked and read in its entirety by the Blessed St Angela herself if it no more than 2 sides of A4 at the absolute most…..1 would be better! Otherwise she’ll get a precis which may not be accurate.

    • Things are bit different in this age of t’interweb, Arno. It’s an open letter. Thousands of people have seen it already.

      Our Ange won’t be able to pretend she hasn’t seen it.

      Is she really going to carry on, rubbishing local authorities and public services across the country, as the Tories set out to do in 2010?

      #FundCroydonFairly

      • I very much doubt that our dear Ange has the time at the moment to read this new fangled thing The World Wide Web of Misinformation, is it?, all by herself and at at her own initiative.

        I am sure that one of her minions… sorry, administrative colleagues… with the right level of seniority… sorry, conjoint responsibility… will bring it to her attention, suitably edited, if he or she feels it merits the attention and time of someone as elevated as a MINISTER.

        However, if it could be tagged FAO AR (great initials, by the way) URGENT: BLUNDERS OF A TORY ELECTED MAYOR it may get a look see.

        • You may be right, of course.

          Only not until she gets back from her rave in Ibiza.

          Urgent matters of state my arse…

          • Union members – the big Labour donors- have done very well for their members already. Payback time. More to come, like the tube drivers.

          • No fan of the notion of “government of the people, for the people”, then, Chrissie?
            Pouring money into the pockets of billionaires and multi-national corporations rarely serves the interests of the many.
            Settling industrial disputes gets people’s operations done, gets people to work on time, and ends up saving money, too.

      • To be fair, councils of all colours rubbished themselves while bigging up their ‘entrepreneurship’ and then going bust. Maladministration and incompetence are engrained. Look at Nottingham, Birmingham, Woking and Thurrock and Croydon. All claimed to be starved of funds from central government while splurging out on vanity projects and asking for us, you and me, to bail them out.

        • The councils dabbled in “entrepreneurship” because they were forced to by the squeezing off of funds. The Government actively encouraged such schemes, throwing hundreds of millions of pounds at councils and telling them to get on with it.

          Big Eric Pickles and “Sniffer” Michael Gove have much to answer for.

  3. Carl Lucas says:

    Now it’s been bought to their attention this Government is more likely to reduce the funding Lambeth has than increase the funding to Croydon.

  4. David White says:

    Andrew puts the case extremely well. But it doesn’t take a crystal ball to predict that Rayner, Starmer and Reeves will ignore it. At best Rayner might send a response full of platitudes.

    This is because the Labour Party under its current leadership subscribes to the same neoliberal policies as previous Tory governments. They will continue to preside over the decimation of public services, while big corporations and ultra-wealthy individuals see their wealth soar.

  5. Alasdair says:

    Interesting letter – thank you for highlighting. What’s the reason for the disparity in funding – is it formula driven or is there a different policy applied to Lambeth?

  6. Pingback: 'Fair funding' cuts could cost Greenwich £25m, councillors warned - The Greenwich Wire

Join the conversation here