Croydon Council was forced into yet another hugely embarrassing court room climbdown this morning, when a group of homelessness campaigners arrived at Croydon County Court following a summons for squatting in a long-disused children’s home in Reedham.
Court protest: demonstrators, including Green councillor Ria Patel (centre) this morning
The presiding judge was unimpressed when he was forced to defer the hearing to April 4 because, according to one eye-witness, “No one seemed to be able to find proof on paper that Croydon Council actually owns the building.”
The judge even asked why the council hadn’t issue an eviction notice back in November and had waited until now.
Such a costly delay in court proceedings over what should have been a routine property matter ought to be doubly embarrassing for the council’s most senior legal official, the hapless Borough Solicitor Stephen Lawrence-Orumwense: before he joined Croydon Council, his previous job was working as an estate agent.
Reclaim Croydon has been providing shelter and support in their Autonomous Winter Shelter on Reedham Park Avenue for the last four months, helping almost 60 people who would otherwise have been forced to sleep rough on the streets.
Home for homeless: Reclaim Croydon has been using the building since November. Croydon Council has been trying to sell it, for £1.25m, since 2021
Having been served with an eviction order, Reclaim Croydon and their supporters organised themselves for this morning’s court appearance.
Which is more than could be said for the highly paid lawyers working for Croydon Council.
A crowd of more than two dozen protesters were outside the court, many of them wearing Jason Perry masks (not a pretty sight) carrying banners and placards.
The Tory Mayor was accused on one placard of being a “Homelessness fascist”.
Homelessness fascist: one of the protestors outside court this morning
During the somewhat curtailed meeting, it was noted by the court that Reclaim Croydon had provided shelter to vulnerable and older people from the streets.
Reclaim Croydon is the same group of anarchist squatters who took over the vacant offices of Brick by Brick on George Street in 2023, until bailiffs smashed in the doors and the group were forced to leave.
It is suggested that the building in Reedham, called Kempfield, has been vacant since at least 2012.
Online sales particulars for the building and its half-an-acre site, placed by the council’s property agents Stiles Harold Williams, show that it has been up for sale since November 2021, with a guide price of £1.25million. So another triumph for Mayor Perry’s “asset disposals strategy”.
Read more: Reclaim Croydon’s free bookshop and café closed by bailiffs
Read more: Welcome to the House of Fun! Squatters claim court victory
Read more: Activists provide shelter to 40 people ignored by council
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
How incompetent can you be? Not even able to demonstrate property deeds as proof of ownership. HM Land Registry is even based in Bedford Park so these geniuses don’t have far to travel to confirm their rights. Isn’t it time the cut backs in Croydon are made where they should be and don’t effect public services. The clueless Borough Solicitor will save a few hundred thousand without his services and endless ineptitude in legal process. While there dump Kurzewell-Reid too and finally the cutbacks will be reaching the levels the Council need to make to stay inside their budget. The inadequate Senior Management really needs to be sent on their way.
Yeah, DelBoy. But how did the estate agent survive this clusterfuck?
https://insidecroydon.com/2022/11/11/you-seem-to-be-trying-to-put-the-genie-back-in-the-bottle/
All done with the complete knowledge and assent of piss-poor Perry and Kerswell.
The reason why they put papers on the building now is because them homeless people reclaim Croydon homed is actually what the council was sending to us but now the doors closed as winter over they have got moody
Is the hand of Perry involved in this mess?
By contrast, Kent CC turn empty premises into housing
https://www.newlocal.org.uk/articles/how-we-did-it-unlocking-empty-properties/?utm_source=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-we-did-it-unlocking-empty-properties
The decision to close the Kempfield children’s home was taken in November 2010 at a Croydon council Cabinet meeting. Perry was either present at that or, if he sent his apologies for absence, would have received the minutes subsequently.
Somewhat ironically, at a Cabinet meeting of September 2012, which Perry definitely attended, approval was given for the “draw down of capital funding to purchase and refurbish two former children’s homes (Kempfield and 167 Oak Avenue) … for conversion to temporary accommodation to relieve the current pressure on B&B for homelessness.”
Perry should be asked to explain why this didn’t happen
There was a planning application from BxB for this site approx 2020….