With 13 of Labour’s 34 current councillors either deselected or standing down, the party has run out of volunteers for a thankless task.
WALTER CRONXITE, Political Editor, reports
Croydon Labour has run out of candidates willing to stand for the party at next May’s local elections.
An urgent appeal was sent out last night. “We are reopening nominations for members to put themselves forward to be Labour candidates in the upcoming 2026 local government elections,” read the email, signed by an unnamed “London Labour procedures secretary”.
The last-gasp appeal reflects the exodus of activists and members in the five years since Keir Starmer and David Evans took over the running of the party, as well as the growing sense of dissatisfaction among those who remain but are uneasy with the direction that Labour has been taking.
Faceless, anonymous regional party officials deselecting a handful of Croydon women councillors won’t have helped grassroots morale much, either.
Croydon Labour is only halfway through its selection process, which has been taken out of local hands and is being supervised by officials from the London region office and the National Executive Committee.
“Our initial round of applications and interviews has returned a strong pool of candidates and longlisted potential candidates,” the Labour email continued, not entirely convincingly.
‘Diverse’: Cllr Patsy Cummings was a London Assembly candidate in 2021. This time round, she’s one of those blocked from standing for selection
“To ensure that we can put forward a representative and diverse team of applicants to the ward members, and subsequently candidates to the electorate, we are inviting further applications.
“We welcome applicants from all backgrounds and experience, and we especially encourage women members to consider applying at this stage. All we ask is that you are willing to work hard as part of a team, play an active role in campaigning, and be committed to making a difference to the lives of your neighbours.”
This from the party hierarchy that blocked six sitting Labour councillors from being allowed to seek re-selection, five of them women, four of them black women.
Croydon Labour has so far announced the outcome of 15 ward selections, naming 42 candidates. These cover mostly what are regarded as “safe Labour” wards, plus Tory-held South Croydon and under-threat seats in Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood and Fairfield wards.
On May 7 2026, in addition to the borough-wide mayoral election, the Town Hall elections will be held across 28 wards for 70 council seats.
Labour won 34 council seats at the last local elections, in 2022. But with retirements as well as the deselections, 13 of the current Labour group at the Town Hall won’t be on the ballot next year. At least, not as candidates for the Labour Party.
Tough gig: in 2022, Labour won two council seats in this ward. In 2026, the LibDems are predicted to win all three
Labour, like the Tories and (when they can rustle up enough members) the LibDems, have a hard-and-fast policy of contesting every available seat in Croydon, even where they know they have no chance of electoral success.
For these 13 other wards, Croydon Labour (or their masters at the all-powerful NEC) therefore require at least 28 members to volunteer to be “paper candidates”.
These are candidates in name only, for wards in the south of the borough where there is little prospect of any real campaigning. It’s all a bit of smoke and mirrors by the political parties (the Tories do much the same in the north of Croydon), amounting to sham democracy.
Labour’s 28 paper candidates will be expected to work as unpaid leaflet-deliverers for Keir Starmer’s party, focusing on getting Rowenna Davis, the Waddon councillor, elected as Croydon Mayor.
The chosen one: Rowenna Davis is Labour’s candidate for Mayor
Last night’s appeal went out with a file-load of additional documents, including “Essential information”, “Councillor job description”, “Qualifications and disqualifications”, “How to apply” and even a “Code of conduct”.
Anyone wishing to put themselves forward for this hiding to nothing has only until midday on Monday to get all the documents read and their forms filled.
Labour’s even prepared to bend its own rules to help fill the blank spaces on its list of candidates.
Usually, to have any chance of being put forward for selection, even as a paper candidate, a member will need to have been on Labour’s books for at least 12 months.
Perhaps a sign of the desperation that has crept in and a lack of volunteers putting themselves forward, last night’s emergency appeal says: “In special circumstances, an exemption can be made to the membership length requirement.” Nod, nod. Wink, wink…
Inside Croydon spoke to several Labour contacts, asking them if they would be putting their names forward for this additional round of selections.
“No,” said one, with more than a suggestion of disgruntlement. “Why should I?”
Another said: “I have serious reservations with so much going on with Labour right now. I won’t even be volunteering to deliver any leaflets this time.”
And a third said: “I’ve already resigned from the party.”
In the pink: Cllrs Clark and Davis on the campaign trail in a rare photograph that appears to show Clark about to drink water
A current Labour member told Inside Croydon last week: “There’s a real dearth of people coming forward to be candidates next year… Once you take out half a dozen sitting councillors whose faces don’t fit, they’ve been forced to plug some holes.
“That’s why they asked Brigitte [Graham] to stay on in Woodside. That’s why they’ve dragged John Wentworth out of retirement.”
It’s been a quieter week as far as Labour ward selections are concerned, since Saturday’s Fairfield meeting went ahead with four candidates for three places. The not-much-liked Councillor Chris Clark was duly re-selected in the ward he has represented since 2018, alongside Cliff Colvin and Davina Brown.
Insiders say that at a poorly attended meeting, Clark garnered the least number of votes of the three chosen candidates. With Clark tied with Laila Mohammed for the third berth, a re-vote had to be held. Clark avoided deselection by Labour members in Fairfield by a single vote.
Clark had been denied the opportunity of going for selection in another, less at-risk ward. Fairfield has had two Green Party councillors since 2022.
Croydon’s local elections, including votes for 70 councillors, are due to be held on Thursday, May 7, 2026.
Read more: Local Labour members angry at ‘travesty’ of selection process
Read more: Labour councillor Clark is forced to seek re-election in Fairfield
Read more: #TheLabourFiles: MP Reed, Evans and the Croydon connection
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our near 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
If the Labour party can’t find 70 people to stand as potential councillors in an election in a borough with a population of 390,000, they need to ask themselves WHY that is….perhaps their current direction doesn’t appeal..!?!
(puts on Mr Humphries’ voice) “I’m free”
Ah, you have me reminiscing about 1970s television, when there were 3 TV channels. 🙂
Perhaps Labour have reached the Reform point where they have to select former perished members to run as candidates. The way things are going for them they may as well select as many Dodo’s as they can with the electoral chances they have in holding onto the seats they have already.
I think they are looking for as diverse a group as possible. Most of the target seats have by now had candidates selected and they are rightly engaged on the campaign. I am genuinely not sure that your reading of the situation is correct. By comparison with selection procedures in other parties Labour’s is by far the most transparent. For example we don’t even know if Simon Fox, Conservatives in Waddon is even running for a further park life. Speculation suggests that his mates in the ‘top team’ have found him somewhere less marginal??
You fail to state, Alan, that you are, as we understand it, an active member of the Labour Party in Croydon. We feel it is only fair and proper to make such declarations, to give all our readers the proper context in which you make your remarks.
We are very confident that our “reading of the situation”, and our very well-placed sources, are absolutely correct. Labour in Croydon is desperate for people to agree to have their names used as paper candidates.
It becomes an odd objective to want a “diverse” set of candidates when earlier this month the same people blocked reselection for five women councillors, four of whom are black. Are they really as committed to diversity as all that?
Labour in Croydon is no more transparent than any of the other parties. None of the information we have reported has been volunteered to us by Labour Party officials.
And as to the matter of Chris Philp’s hired help, Simon Fox, there is no “speculation”. We reported several weeks ago that, with his prospects of retaining his seat in Waddon much reduced, he will be standing in one of the Purley wards, closer to where he lives.
I wasn’t aware of any stipulation to identify party membership. It doesn’t seem reasonable as I do not hold any public office, not even sure it really matters. I do not deny my membership and involvement though – On transparency I haven’t seen any declaration of candidacy from the Conservative Party except the incumbent. On Simon Fox I have asked him more than once on his numerous social media posts but he declines to answer.
If Fox can’t say “Yes, I’m standing in Waddon”, then it is reasonable to assume the opposite is true.
I have tried to return to Labour Thornton Heath after serious illness. I have sent in details for the Councilor selection process and had no feedback. I did run before and was second to Patsy Cummings who I know well.
I did have some kind of contact from my Branch ( Thornton Heath ) regarding a Zoom Meeting ,but nothing further.
I did bump into Clive Fraser on the Campaign trail and this was the last contact that I had.
I am aware that all members were sent an online zoom meeting link to vote for the candidates as part of the selection process – the meeting was held and 3 candidates were selected.
So you are now speaking on behalf of the Labour Party, Alan!
He’s more than active, he’s right in the heart of Row’s campaign, you tell them Al!