CROYDON COMMENTARY: Location. Location. Location. LEWIS WHITE is less concerned about the need to build flats in the redevelopment at College Green, provided they offer enough open spaces and are of the right quality, and not mega-sized tower blocks
David Wickens’ article on the plans for the Fairfield Halls and College Green – “Can two-bedroom flats really be the solution for Fairfield Halls?” – was very clear-sighted, and very helpful, whilst Arno Rabinowitz’s contribution as a comment adds in just a few words a cautionary floodlight to help us avoid the pitfall of naive acceptance.

The Fairfield Halls, with College Green top left of picture, is about to be changed forever
One thing I would like to add is the observation that, for central Croydon, we have to be looking at flats, for two reasons. The first is land values. Taberner House could never be replaced with semi-detached houses, thatched cottages, or even Addams Family-sized mansions: the land value is too high and the setting is wrong.
In town centre locations, flats look right – if the designs are good, if daylight comes in through correct placing and massing of blocks relative to the sun (too often, it is squeezed out by ignorance, and greed, the two main supporters of bad design) and if materials are well-chosen and domestic in feel, for example, the right type of brick, not smooth machine-aesthetic metal panels like certain office blocks, or guaranteed to stain and look very grubby within two years.
The next questions flow on rapidly from the conclusion — how high should the blocks be? Seven-storey, 15 to 20, or Mega Mental… sorry Menta Tower-type developments of 50 to 60 storeys? Next question: how many bedrooms? One would have thought that a mix would be right.
Continue reading →
Like this:
Like Loading...