Neighbours start legal challenge over Brick by Brick ‘bias’

A group of neighbours in South Norwood have started a crowd-funding appeal to raise money to pay for a legal challenge against Croydon council and planning chair Paul Scott over a Brick by Brick development which will overshadow their homes.

Alex Toogood’s CrowdJustice page went live this morning, seeking to raise £30,000 towards a Judicial Review against the decision of the council’s planning committee, which she claims has shown bias in favour of the developer – the council’s own housing company – and demonstrates multiple conflicts of interest while ignoring significant elements of the council’s own planning officials’ reports.

“We are concerned that the council is driving through decisions without the usual democratic safeguards because the council is simultaneously the land-owner, developer and planning authority,” Toogood said.

“We feel there is a clear conflict of interest with this planning process.”

Judicial Reviews are a last-chance for ordinary people to challenge decisions by local authorities and government through the courts, though they are notoriously expensive and hard to win against the massed forces of public-funded civil servants and council officers.

In this case, Toogood and her friends and neighbours have been amassing a large volume of evidence of what they claim to be bias from Labour councillor Scott’s own public remarks.

This is the huge wall Brick by Brick intends to impose on the owners of private residences in South Norwood

Planning permission was granted at the end of March for a Brick by Brick scheme to build a three-storey tall block of flats on garages and a forecourt north of Avenue Road in SE25.

Toogood’s CrowdJustice page explains, “We are fighting Croydon Council and their developer Brick by Brick to stop them building a development that will impact our families, block out our light, overlook our homes and damage our community.

“This huge wall, towering over our home will be overbearing, oppressive and will block out our light.

“We are concerned that the council is driving through decisions without the usual democratic safeguards because the council is simultaneously the land-owner, developer and planning authority. We feel there is a clear conflict of interest with this planning process.”

The potential for conflicts of interest have been highlighted before.

  • Brick by Brick’s managing director, Colm Lacey, is employed as Croydon Council’s director of development.
  • Brick by Brick is overseen by Councillor Alison Butler, the council cabinet member for homes, regeneration and planning.
  • Butler is married to another Labour councillor, Paul Scott, an architect by profession who also happens to be the chair of the planning committee.

Toogood’s appeal page states: “We feel there is clear conflict of interest within the council’s planning committee, and a bias towards their own developer.

Cosy: Alison Butler and Paul Scott the husband and wife duo who are pushing through Brick by Brick schemes

“They will tear down our family’s rear garden wall, which is currently one-storey high, and replace it with a three-storey, 9.8-metre wall. The developer’s own planning experts have admitted that this building does not meet lighting guidelines, and will therefore reduce the light coming into our home and garden.

“This developer is building all across Croydon on in-fill sites, green spaces and play areas. The majority of the housing they are building will be for private sale and there will be minimal affordable and council housing.”

As one Katharine Street source said this morning, “All the leaflets and petitions and banners on the steps of the Town Hall can be shrugged off by Scott, Butler and Jo Negrini, the council chief executive who is pushing through this pet project.

“But a court challenge is something else, and planning policy has strict rules and guidelines that demand that decisions are made individually, on a case-by-case basis, without any prejudice or predetermination. There’s a chance that this group could be joined by residents from elsewhere in the borough to examine what Scott, and others, have said about their schemes, and the instructions that have been given to members of the planning committee about having to grant permission to all Brick by Brick’s schemes.

“And if that were to happen, Scott and Negrini could have a few problems.”

To view the appeal page, click here.

  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • “Monitored” by the council CEO since 2010
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS 2017: Inside Croydon was source for two award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Alison Butler, Brick by Brick, Colm Lacey, Croydon Council, Housing, Jo Negrini, Paul Scott, Planning, Property, South Norwood and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Neighbours start legal challenge over Brick by Brick ‘bias’

  1. derekthrower says:

    Would have been a lot cheaper putting up an anti-Brick2Brick candidate at the local elections against the Bald Ego. Probably would have find a lot more immediate leverage with the Labour Party if they have tried this.

  2. Charles Calvin says:

    It is an absolute disgrace that Croydon residents should find it necessary to take Labour Croydon Council and the chair of planning to court over proposed developments which will impact the quality of their lives. A sad day for Croydon.

Leave a Reply