Even the right-wing press doesn’t much care for the Harrow hairdresser. By our political editor, WALTER CRONXITE
At the 11th hour, and after some wavering in the final days before tomorrow’s London elections, the Evening Standard has said it supports Labour’s Sadiq Khan to be elected as Mayor of London for a third time.
This is a slap in the face for Conservative candidate Susan Hall, but not undeserved and certainly overdue.
The Evening Boris is not called that without good reason: the commuter’s evening paper, a favourite of City workers on their journeys home to the suburbs and stockbroker belt, has long been Tory supporting. It is owned by a Russian billionaire who was made a peer by Boris Johnson and until recently had former Tory Chancellor Gideon Osborne as its editor.
So for the Standard, on the eve of the election, to endorse Labour’s Khan is quite a move, and reflects very harshly on Hall as a Conservative candidate, and on her party for selecting her.
The Standard endorsement does not come without caveats. Khan’s eight years at City Hall has not been without its downsides.
But when the Conservatives have nothing to offer Londoners and they have framed almost their entire campaign around their counter-factual, illogical opposition to one measure, ULEZ expansion, they really left Dylan Jones, the newspaper’s editor, and his editorial staff no where to go. The Standard is an enthusiastic supporter of Mayor Khan’s ULEZ extension.
Knock-out blow: if Susan Hall can’t win over the right-wing Evening Boris…
It seems entirely impossible that Jones won’t have cleared this last-minute intervention with his proprietor, Evgeny Lebedev.
It is a low-risk editorial punt: the newspaper knows that they will have to work with Mayor Khan for another four years.
They have published their support on a day when polling suggests that Hall has got as close to Khan as she has ever been, with the gap down to 10%. In any other election, a 10% margin for the winner would be embraced as a magnificent achievement.
Hall’s campaign, the Standard says, critically, “does not appear close to being enough to win over the floating voters any Conservative candidate must secure to be competitive in the capital”.
Hall is the hairdresser from Harrow who, politically, is just a fringe figure. Although a London Assembly Member, she has never personally been elected to City Hall, but has relied on the capital’s party list system to jump aboard the gravy train.
The Standard describes the Conservative selection that arrived at Hall as their candidate as “chaos”, and suggests that they would have been happier if Paul Scully, the MP for Sutton and Cheam, had been the choice.
Hall’s “campaign has proved to be uneven at best, not aided by a lack of support from a national party which all too often affords the impression of having given up on the capital,” they say. And that’s without mentioning Hall’s overt support for Donald Trump and far-right extremists in this country.
Never convinced: the Standard has not taken to the vacuous (at best) Susan Hall
On housing, “Londoners continue to be priced out of their own city”, the paper observes, correctly, of the Mayor’s struggles in a housing environment framed by the disastrous Right To Buy.
But Khan’s “biggest weakness is undoubtedly crime”, they say, “with knife crime having risen significantly since 2016 and jumped 20% in the most recent annual figures covering the 12 months to the end of last December”.
The paper continues: “Still, Khan can point to some significant policy achievements. First on air pollution, a silent killer on London’s streets. On transport, the Mayor remained a champion for the Elizabeth Line in its difficult stages and can take his share of credit for the remarkable turnaround in Transport for London’s finances, which were on life-support following the pandemic.”
The paper calls out the Conservative Government for its anti-democratic move to change the mayoral voting system: “The decision by the Government to switch the electoral system to first-past-the-post dictates that voters realistically have only one of two levers to pull: Labour or Conservative. This theoretically increases the chances of an upset.”
The inference is that even that stunt won’t be enough to salvage Hall’s chances of success. The paper fails to mention any of the 11 other mayoral candidates, not even Count Binface, although the Greens’ Zoe Garbett and LibDem Rob Blackie get to be caricatured in the paper’s cartoon.
The Standard says, “Of course, this election is ultimately about the future. Who can work more closely with what is likely to be a Labour government, secure the investment and demand the greater powers the capital needs to thrive as a global city in the 21st century?
“In a straight choice, we believe that person is Khan.”
For more information on where to vote on May 2 and who is standing for election, use our widget here:
Read more: May 2’s election day will show how bad things are for Tories
Read more: Labour figures at centre of police probe now seek your votes
Read more: Council’s official guide on voting in May 2’s London elections
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
The Standard may be a ‘Tory paper’, but few people read it. In the late ‘eighties they SOLD 500,000 copies, now they distribute 277,00 freebies that are left on the tube and trains for the cleaners to collect. Today’s London commuters get their news from Inside Croydon and social media. These sophisticated people ignore the strident voices and will vote on Khan’s record on crime – nothing else much matters.
Usual bollocks, Chris.
The Evening Boris has a website
The Evening Standard should be called the Sub-Standard. I commute into the City daily and hardly ever see anyone under 70 reading it. It’s a waste of paper and was ruined by George Osbourne and its dodgy Russian owners. Was once a great campaigning newspaper – it’s now a trash lamentable rag
“Once a great campaigning newspaper”? Really? Must have missed that…
It really tells you about the terrible state of the Tories and the sub-standard personnel they have operating when they can’t even hang onto a paper owned by those ennobled by Boris Johnson. Picking a single issue to focus onto over ULEZ when 95% of vehicles are unaffected demonstrates their strategic knuckleheadedness.
Further playing games with virulent racists and thugs to give the wink shows their moral bankruptcy. They have falling off a cliff and are so insensate they can’t even feel the damage they have done to themselves, let alone contemplate how they have wrecked the country with their half baked ideas.