Michael Gove’s £600m hand-out to local authorities in England, announced yesterday, won’t go very far, especially if you consider that the Government’s own expert panel reckons Croydon alone needs £540m to wipe out a chunk of its toxic debt.
By ANDREW FISHER
Councils in England are today receiving £15billion less in core government funding than they were in 2010.
That is the context which needs to be set against every warning about council bankruptcy, every Section 114 notice issued and every time you hear about local services being cut or Council Tax going up.
Yesterday’s announcement from Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, of an extra £600million this year for the 300-or-so councils in England needs to be placed alongside another report issued by his department on the same day, from the improvement panel in Croydon, where the experts appointed by Government agree that this one cash-strapped council alone needs £540million to write off a portion of its debt to secure its recovery.
In recent weeks the Government has been under extraordinary pressure on the issue of councils’ failing finances – with more than 40 Conservative MPs writing to the Prime Minister begging for extra resources for their authorities, and MP Ben Bradley, who has a second job as the leader of Tory-run Nottinghamshire Council, also taking to the airwaves to plea for more funding.
In December, the Government announced its Local Government Finance Settlement – with Gove proclaiming, “These proposals will provide councils with the support they need.”
Council leaders across the country, from all political parties, disagreed.
They lobbied MPs this week in Westminster and made it clear that the funding proposals fell short of what councils need to stay afloat. A combination of rising care costs, increase staffing costs from the uprating in the minimum wage (many local government workers are low paid), and the soaring demand for temporary accommodation – especially in major cities and the south-east – have all exacerbated councils’ financial woes.
This is where the politics comes in.
This May will be the last set of local elections before the General Election. More councils collapsing does not look good in the run-up to a General Election, and neither would widespread Conservative defeats in town halls across the country.
So Gove has also weighted £500million of this additional funding on social care – rather than on housing. In urban councils with a younger population and higher house prices, it is extra housing costs causing more of the strain. In more rural areas with older populations, it is care that is the rising cost burden. Councils in rural areas tend to be Conservative-led, and those in urban areas more likely Labour. But this divide is not a clean one.
Earlier this week, leader Stephen Holt revealed that his Eastbourne Council (LibDem-controlled) currently spends 49p in every pound on temporary accommodation. He told Sky News, “If we’re not careful that safety net is going to collapse.”
And take our very own Croydon for example. An urban council in outer London, but one with rising child and adult social care demands, too. It is a Conservative-led administration, but they won’t be popping the champagne corks in Croydon Town Hall to celebrate Gove’s extra pennies.
In that latest report from the misnamed Croydon improvement and assurance panel, which oversees the downgrading of our council’s services, they recommended “that consideration be given to writing-off £540 million of debt (or providing annual support of £38m in order to sustain it)”.
Even if Gove’s £600million announced yesterday was divided just among London’s 32 boroughs, it would mean Croydon receiving less than half that predicted £38million annual shortfall.
As it is, with the details of the allocation to individual councils yet to be determined, Croydon will be lucky to receive more than £4million from this pot. So probably less than 10% of what is needed just to sustain the unsustainable debt.
It’s important to remember that despite local propaganda about the unique failure of Croydon, actually our borough does not even rank in the 10 most indebted councils in Britain (see chart below, where the missing label for the second bar is for Spelthorne in Surrey).
A senior councillor for a large city council elsewhere in England told me, “The amount each council will get won’t be a game changer for a lot of the worse-off councils.”
Councillors’ representatives were similarly lukewarm about the additional funding, highlighting that at best it would be a stopgap.
Tim Oliver, the chairman of the County Councils Network, said it “will go some way to easing the pressures”, while Sir Stephen Houghton, chairman of the Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities, which represents urban councils, said it “shows that there is a growing understanding within the Government about the crisis in local government finances”.
Houghton added, “It is disappointing that the funding has only been announced at this late hour. More funding will be required to match the current level of demand-led pressures and stabilise the sector.”
The Local Government Association estimates councils in England face a £1.6billion funding gap in 2024-2025, even with the additional funding announced.
‘Managing demand’ is a euphemism for failing people in need
While extra money for social care will be welcome – and is much needed – let’s put that in context for Croydon: in the current financial year (2023-2024), Croydon Council has cut £12million from its adult social care budget.
In the council’s budget webcast last month, Mayor Jason Perry’s cabinet member for finance, Jason Cummings, set out that adult social care would lose a further £5million from its budget in 2024-2025.
At best, the funding announced this week will only partly ameliorate the proposed cuts for this coming year. It’s something that Croydon’s councillors should scrutinise closely over the coming weeks.
The Croydon improvement and assurance panel report states: “The adult social care and health directorate has maintained the necessary progress in implementation of its ‘managing demand’ programme over the last 12 months. This has enabled the delivery of a balanced budget within 2022-2023, indeed bringing the financial year to an end with a small underspend.”
“Managing demand” is a euphemism for failing to deliver for people in need of care.
A “small underspend” presumably means that the council cut even more brutally than as proposed in the March 2023 budget.
So despite Michael Gove’s self-congratulation, nothing much has changed.
Council Tax-payers across Britain can expect to pay more and get less next year.
- From 2015 to 2019, Andrew Fisher was the Labour Party’s Director of Policy under Jeremy Corbyn. Fisher is also the author of The Failed Experiment – and how to build an economy that works, and now writes regular columns for InsideCroydon, the i newspaper and is a regular pundit on BBC and Sky News programmes
Andrew Fisher’s recent columns:
- Bailing out the water companies is poor policy – and unpopular
- 2024 will be a time for honesty and straight-talking in politics
- Perry struggles with numbers to offer us: Pay More, Get Less
- ‘Teetering on the edge’: Hunt does nothing for local councils
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
The UK is the 6th biggest economy in the world. There is no reason why Government funding to local councils should be cut by £15 billion since 2010, except the Tories’ doctrinaire desire to shrink the public sector and transfer resources from the poor to the rich.
Regrettably Starmer’s Labour has no plans to reverse this process; indeed they have said they will basically carry on with the Tories’ financial policies.
Four of the top five councils by debt per resident were run up by Conservatives. You would think the Conservatives would have an interest in trying to resolve these problems of crippling debts run up during their oversight of management utilising freedoms provided by their legislative changes.
Again not one word about a programme to tackle this and any changes to make sure it is doesn’t happen again. When dogma controls decision making you are trapped into a groundhog lifetime of failure. It is clear that the Tories have no interest in the failure caused by their watch over public finances and just a sticking plaster of funds is issued to placate the small number of Tory MP’s who made some vocal protest about the disastrous state of affairs. It is going to be a messy job trying to fix this and can’t you hear the Tories now complaining about the inequitable methods against the rich that will have to be introduced to make some progress on this.
At the 2010 election they claimed the country was bankrupt. After almost a decade an a half we are inheriting their long term results. The IFS have announced public finances are in their worst state for 70 years. The Tories didn’t fix the roof. They actively dug holes and subsided the foundations of the country.