Whose side is Croydon Council on? As JOE PAXTON reports from the Town Hall, Crystal Palace Council Tax-payers face a four-day public hearing having had little support from their own local authority
A David v Goliath battle commences at the Town Hall this morning, with a planning appeal brought by the owners of the Queen’s Hotel at Crystal Palace.

The fate of the Victorian-built Queen’s Hotel at Crystal Palace is subject of a public inquiry this week
The public inquiry run by the government’s planning inspectorate could last up to four days, with lawyers, planning experts, councillors and ordinary residents called to give evidence.
The hotel owners have twice had their expansion plans rejected by the local planning committee, as councillors rebelled against the edict of the council’s planning officials and committee chairman to reject the multi-million-pound overdevelopment.
As the public inquiry gets underway this morning, the battle lines are clearly drawn up.
On one side is big business, which has overt backing in the past from Croydon Council’s planning department and the erstwhile planning committee chair, Labour councillor Paul Scott. The hotel owners, Euro Hotels, have run a campaign to get the £10million scheme pushed through regardless of the impact it might have on a conservation area. Leading that campaign for has been PR consultant and Labour councillor from Lambeth, Jim Dickson.
On the other side are the residents, who have scrambled together the cash to be able to get representation by a barrister in an effort to defend their homes and neighbourhood. They have had public support from Dickson’s former boss at Lambeth Council, Steve Reed OBE, now the MP for Croydon North, as well as their ward councillors.
But Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood councillors Stephen Mann and Pat Ryan have been unable to be interviewed by Inside Croydon about the important public inquiry, however, because their Labour group leader, Tony Newman – a long-time close pal of Scott – has banned them from speaking to this website, in what some suggest is an abuse of power, and others portray as a deliberate attempt to gag the residents’ case. Continue reading →
Like this:
Like Loading...