CROYDON LABOUR IN CRISIS: Shawcross joins condemnation of senior Labour councillors after they are let off lightly for breaking ethics rules.
EXCLUSIVE by STEVEN DOWNES

Rule breakers: when both in Newman’s cabinet, Alison Butler and Paul Scott were receiving £93,000 a year in council allowances
Right to the bitter end, Paul Scott and Alison Butler, the couple who were at the core of the Croydon Labour cabal which bankrupted the borough, were bending the council rules to breaking point and beyond.
That has been confirmed by a ruling from the council’s most senior legal officer, released last night, which says that Butler and Scott broke the Town Hall Code of Conduct by attending, speaking at (in Scott’s case) and voting at a meeting to discuss the latest Report In The Public Interest to be slapped on their wretched administration, this time over the shambolic refurbishment of the Fairfield Halls.
Neither Butler nor Scott made any formal declaration of interests, even though Butler, as the former council cabinet member for homes, was criticised by the auditors who produced the RIPI as one of those responsible for the £67million Fairfield Halls fiasco, starting with the disastrous decision to hand the refurbishment work to in-house house-builders Brick by Brick.
Just as troubling, none of their councillor colleagues thought there might be anything a bit dodgy about allowing the husband of one of those singled out by auditors critical of the Fairfield refurbishment to speak at the meeting. Labour’s chief whip, Clive “Thirsty” Fraser, saw nothing wrong in including Scott as one of the councillors to cross-examine Grant Thornton.
But the disciplinary report, compiled by interim Monitoring Officer John Jones, reveals that Butler had spoken to him before the meeting, held in the Town Hall Chamber on February 3. But Jones allowed her to attend the meeting without any declaration of interest. Continue reading →
Like this:
Like Loading...